@ARTICLE{33704756_230090223_2018, 
	author = {Vladimir Serkin}, 
	keywords = {, psychotherapeutic myth, system approach, consultative dyadconsultative decision},
	title = {Client psyhotherapeutic myth: Methodological and organizational issues (in Russian)},
	journal = {Organizational Psychology},
	year = {2018},
	volume = {8},
	number = {4},
	pages = {156-167},
	url = {https://orgpsyjournal.hse.ru/en/2018-8-4/230090223.html},
	publisher = {},
	abstract = {In the article one of the most important stages of the consultative interaction (the construction of a consultative solution) is discussed. From the author’s position the advisory decision is consideredas a psychotherapeutic myth, builted as a result of the advisory synergistic interaction advisory dyad: client — consultant. The subject of the solution is neither the client or the consultant, namely, the consultative dyad. The author does not distinguish between organizational and individual counseling, considering the stage of building solutions using the concepts of a systems approach: polyfurcation periods, dissipative structures, and autopoietic solutions. The article contains examples on the basis of which the author’s main statements are illustrated.},
	annote = {In the article one of the most important stages of the consultative interaction (the construction of a consultative solution) is discussed. From the author’s position the advisory decision is consideredas a psychotherapeutic myth, builted as a result of the advisory synergistic interaction advisory dyad: client — consultant. The subject of the solution is neither the client or the consultant, namely, the consultative dyad. The author does not distinguish between organizational and individual counseling, considering the stage of building solutions using the concepts of a systems approach: polyfurcation periods, dissipative structures, and autopoietic solutions. The article contains examples on the basis of which the author’s main statements are illustrated.}
}