@ARTICLE{33704756_599961074_2022, 
	author = {Tatyana Tatarinova and Vladislav Dominiak}, 
	keywords = {, psychological ownership, engagement in organization, organizational commitment, possibilities for the realization of motivators, organizational citizenship behaviorstaff turnover},
	title = {Psychological ownership in an organizational context: Antecedents, correlates, and consequences (in Russian)},
	journal = {Organizational Psychology},
	year = {2022},
	volume = {12},
	number = {1},
	pages = {153-174},
	url = {https://orgpsyjournal.hse.ru/en/2022-12-1/599961074.html},
	publisher = {},
	abstract = {At present, there is a shortage of domestic research focused on organization-based psychological ownership. Purpose. The research aimed to study the relationship between psychological ownership, engagement in organization and possibilities for the realization of motivators, assessment of the satisfaction with the organizational culture, organizational commitment, organizational citizenship behavior, and intention to stay in the organization. Sample: 106 Russian organizations employees, 65 women and 41 men. Study design. The methods used: The Organizational Commitment Questionnaire (OCQ) developed by L. Porter and adopted by V. Dominyak, The Possibility for the Realization of Motivators developed by V. Dominyak and E. Rodionova, author’s questionnaire to assess engagement in organization, author’s form to assess organization-based psychological ownership, Extra-Role Behavior Scale developed by B. Rebzuev, In-Role Behavior Scale developed by L. Williams and S. Anderson, Organizational Culture Assessment Instrument (OCAI) developed by K. Cameron and R. Quinn. Data was processed with: Pearson’s r and Spearman’s ρ coefficients, Multiple Regression Analysis (MRA), Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). Findings. We derived a model showing that the possibility for the realization of motivators is the predictor of psychological ownership, organization engagement and organizational commitment; psychological ownership determines organization engagement and organizational commitment; The model suggests that organizational engagement determines organizational citizenship behavior and organizational commitment determines intention to stay in the organization. Value of results. This model and coverage of the psychological ownership topic is the scientific novelty of this study.},
	annote = {At present, there is a shortage of domestic research focused on organization-based psychological ownership. Purpose. The research aimed to study the relationship between psychological ownership, engagement in organization and possibilities for the realization of motivators, assessment of the satisfaction with the organizational culture, organizational commitment, organizational citizenship behavior, and intention to stay in the organization. Sample: 106 Russian organizations employees, 65 women and 41 men. Study design. The methods used: The Organizational Commitment Questionnaire (OCQ) developed by L. Porter and adopted by V. Dominyak, The Possibility for the Realization of Motivators developed by V. Dominyak and E. Rodionova, author’s questionnaire to assess engagement in organization, author’s form to assess organization-based psychological ownership, Extra-Role Behavior Scale developed by B. Rebzuev, In-Role Behavior Scale developed by L. Williams and S. Anderson, Organizational Culture Assessment Instrument (OCAI) developed by K. Cameron and R. Quinn. Data was processed with: Pearson’s r and Spearman’s ρ coefficients, Multiple Regression Analysis (MRA), Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). Findings. We derived a model showing that the possibility for the realization of motivators is the predictor of psychological ownership, organization engagement and organizational commitment; psychological ownership determines organization engagement and organizational commitment; The model suggests that organizational engagement determines organizational citizenship behavior and organizational commitment determines intention to stay in the organization. Value of results. This model and coverage of the psychological ownership topic is the scientific novelty of this study.}
}