Functions of work groups and informal subgroups in relation to their members: Relative salience and connection with group effectiveness
Abstract
Purpose. The aim of the study is twofold: (a) comparative analysis of the degree to which work groups and informal subgroups implement six functions in relation to their members and (b) examination of both direct and indirect associations of these functions with social effectiveness and performance effectiveness of the respective groups (subgroups). The following functions were studied: (a) creating possibilities for realization of individual goals and needs; (b) protection from external social threats; (c) informing members; (d) teaching members; (e) adaptation of members; and (f) providing control and regulation. Study design. The study was conducted among 49 work groups, which included 290 employees. A formal algorithm for identifying informal subgroups and three questionnaires were used to measure, respectively, functions of group or subgroup and two types of group effectiveness. Findings. It was revealed that the subgroups implement five functions (except for the function of control and regulation) with higher strength than the work groups do. The functions of both groups (except for the function of control and regulation) and subgroups are positively associated with their social effectiveness. Group size moderated the association of the four functions with group social effectiveness. Two of the six functions of work groups have an indirect effect on group performance effectiveness, mediated by group social effectiveness. Value of the results. This study makes the first step toward: (a) comparative analyses of the functions work groups and informal subgroups carry out in relation to their respective members and (b) understanding of the role these functions play in the overall effectiveness of groups or subgroups. Practical implications. The ideas and results of this study can be used by supervisors, human resource managers and organizational psychologists for strengthening group functions and group effectiveness.
Downloads
References
Baron, R. A., Byrne, D., Johnson, B. T. (1998). Exploring social psychology (4th ed.). Boston, Mass.: Allyn and Bacon.
Baumeister, R. F., Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497–529. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497
Carton, A. M., Cummings, J. N. (2012). A theory of subgroups in work teams. Academy of Management Review, 37, 441–470. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.0322
Chan, D. (2000). Understanding adaptation to change in the work environment: Integrating individual difference and learning perspectives. In G. R. Ferris (ed.). Research in personnel and human resource management. Vol. 18 (1–42). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. Retrieved from https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/216/
Charkhabi, M., Firoozabadi, A., Seidel, L., Habibi, A. M., De Paola, F, Dutheil, F. (2024) Work addiction risk, stress and well-being at work: Testing the mediating role of sleep quality. Frontiers in Public Health, 12, 1352646. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1352646
Cooper, D., Thatcher, S. M. B. (2010). Identification in organizations: The role of self-concept orientations and identification motives. Academy of Management Review, 35, 516–538. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2010.53502693
Doblinger, M. (2021). Individual competencies for self-managing team performance: A systematic literature review. Small Group Research, 53(7), 128–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/10464964211041114
Edelmann, C. M., Boen, F., Stouten, J., Vande Broek, G., Fransen, K. (2024). The power of peer leaders: Exploring the link between peer leadership behaviors and sustainable work outcomes. Behavioral Sciences, 14, 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14010002
Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117–140. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/001872675400700202
Hackman, J. R. (1987). The design of work teams. In J. W. Lorsch (ed.). Handbook of organizational behavior (315–342). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Retrieved from http://openlibrary.org/books/OL2712055M/Handbook_of_organizational_behavior
Han, Y., Tang, B., Li, X. M., Yang, G. S. R., Yang, L. (2023). Research on the relationship between informational team faultline and team resilience — team leader member exchange and team member exchange as mechanism. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, 22, 3585–3597. https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S436618.
Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2nd ed). New York; London: Guilford press.
Inceoglu, I., Thomas, G., Chu, C., Plans, D., Gerbasi, A. (2018). Leadership behavior and employee well-being: An integrated review and a future research agenda. Leadership Quarterly, 29, 179–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.12.006
Jaiswal, A., Dyaram, L. (2018). Towards well-being: Role of diversity and nature of work. Employee Relations, 41, 158–175. https://doi.org/10.1108/er-11-2017-0279
Jundt, D. K., Mindy, K. S. (2023). A process perspective on adaptive performance: Research insights and new directions. Group and Organization Management, 48, 405-435. https://doi.org/10.1177/10596011231161404
Klein, C., Salas, E., Le, H., Burke, C. S., Lyons, R., Goodwin, G. F. (2009). Does team building work? Small Group Research, 40, 181–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496408328821
Koval, E. S., Sidorenkov, A. V. (2013). Socio-psychological adaptation of workers and efficiency of small groups. Russian Psychological Journal, 3, 29–36. Retrieved September 29, 2023, from https://rpj.ru.com/index.php/rpj/article/view/402/757
Magpili, N. C., Pazos, P. (2017). Self-managing team performance: A systematic review of multilevel input factors. Small Group Research, 49, 3–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496417710500
Mannix, E. A. (1993). Organizations as resource dilemmas: The effects of power balance on coalition formation in small groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 55, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.1989.4981267
Mathieu, J. E., Maynard M. T., Rapp T., Gilson L. (2008). Team effectiveness 1997-2007: A review of recent advancements and a glimpse into the future. Journal of Management, 34, 410–476. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308316061
Moreland, R. L. (2010). Are dyads really groups? Small Group Research, 41, 251–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496409358618
Morgan, S. E., Ahn, S., Mosser, A., Harrison, T. R., Wang, J., Huang, Q., Ryan, A., Mao, B., Bixby, J. (2021). The effect of team communication behaviors and processes on interdisciplinary teams’ research productivity and team satisfaction. Informing Science: The International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline, 24, 83–110. https://doi.org/10.28945/4857
Oyster, C. K. (2000). Groups: A user’s guide. Boston: McGraw-Hill Higher Companies.
Paul, R., Drake, J. R., Liang, H. (2016). Global virtual team performance: The effect of coordination effectiveness, trust, and team cohesion. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 59, 186–202. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2016.2583319
Riddle, B. L., Anderson, C. M., Martin, M. M. (2000). Small group socialization scale: Development and validity. Small Group Research, 31, 554–572. https://doi.org/10.1177/104649640003100503
Robbins, S. P. (2005). Essentials of organizational behavior (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ.: Pearson/Prentice Hall.
Roodt, H., Krug, H., Otto, K. (2021). Subgroup formation in diverse virtual teams: The moderating role of identity leadership. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 722650. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.722650
Sherif, M. (1961). Intergroup conflict and cooperation: The Robbers Cave experiment. Vol. 10. (150–198). University of Oklahoma. Institute of Group Relations, Norman, OK: University Book Exchange.
Sidorenkov, A. V. (2010). Small group and informal subgroups: Micro-group theory. Rostov-na-Don: Southern Federal University Press. (In Russ.)
Sidorenkov, A. V., Borokhovski, E. F. (2024а). Activity and interconnections of individual and collective actors: An integrative approach to small group research. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 58, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-023-09769-w
Sidorenkov, A. V., Borokhovski, E. F. (2023). The role of cohesion and productivity norms in performance and social effectiveness of work groups and informal subgroups. Behavioral Sciences, 13, 361. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13050361
Sidorenkov, A. V., Borokhovski, E. F. (2024b). Comparative analysis of the functions work groups and informal subgroups carry out in relation to their members: The essence, conditions of implementation, effects, and dysfunctions. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 58, 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-024-09834-y
Sidorenkov A., Ignatov D., Stroh W., Eribekyan A., Obukhova Y. (2024). Razrabotka ekspress-oprosnika funktsiy proizvodstvennoy gruppy i neformal’nykh podgrupp po otnosheniyu k svoim chlenam [Developing an express questionnaire for assessing the functions of work groups and informal subgroups in relation to their respective members]. Organizational Psychology, 14, 55–76 (in Russ.)
Sidorenkov, A. V., Koval, E. S. (2015). Interrelation between group phenomena and socio-psychological adaptation of employees in the organization. Psikhologicheskii Zhurnal, 36, 34–46. (in Russ.)
Sidorenkov, A. V., Pavlenko, R. V. (2015). GROUP PROFILE computer technique: A tool for complex study of small groups. SAGE Open, 5(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440155694187774
Smirnov, G. A. (1997). The concept of integrity and principles of building knowledge systems. In D. M. Gvishiani (ed.), System research. Methodological problems. Yearbook 1997 (180–202). Moscow: Editorial URSS (in Russ.)
Stephan, W. G., Stephan, C. W. (2019). lntergroup relations. United Kingdom: Taylor & Francis.
Tajfel, H., Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel and W. G. Austin (Eds.). Psychology of Intergroup Relations, 2nd ed. (7–24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
Veelen van, R., Ufkes, E. G. (2019). Teaming up or down? A multisource study on the role of team identification and learning in the team diversity–performance link. Group & Organization Management, 44, 38–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601117750532
Whitman, D. S., van Rooy, D. L., Viswesvaran, C. (2010). Satisfaction, citizenship behaviors, and performance in work units: A meta-analysis of collective construct relations. Personnel Psychology, 63, 41–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2009.01162.x
Williams, K. D. (2010). Dyads can be groups (and often are). Small Group Research, 44, 267–281. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496409358619
Wittenbaum, G. M., Hollingshead, A. B., Botero, I. C. (2004). From cooperative to motivated information sharing in groups: Moving beyond the hidden profile paradigm. Communication Monographs, 71, 286–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/0363452042000299894
Wrightsman, L. S. (1960). Effects of waiting with others on changes in level of felt anxiety. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 61, 216–222. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040144
Zander, A. (1971). Motives and goals in groups. New York: Academic Press.
