Social cognitive theory perspective on agile-digital oriented for innovative work behavior
-
Abstract
Purpose. This study aims to examine the role of Agile-digital oriented behavior in innovative work behavior, within the framework of social cognitive theory. Approach. The research proposes a conceptual model integrating Agile-digital oriented behavior on innovative work behavior. The model is grounded in social cognitive theory and synthesizes concepts from digital mindset and agile individual literature. Findings. The conceptual model suggests that Agile-digital oriented behavior, characterized by adaptability to change and effective use of digital technology on employees’ innovative behavior. Originality. This study introduces the novel concept of “Agile-digital oriented” behavior and proposes it as a key mechanism in relationship to innovative work behavior. It extends social cognitive theory by integrating digital and agile perspectives in explaining innovative behavior in modern work environments.
Downloads
References
Assen van, M. F. (2020). Empowering leadership and contextual ambidexterity — The mediating role of committed leadership for continuous improvement. European Management Journal, 38(3), 435–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2019.12.002
Baker, W. E., Sinkula, J. M. (1999). The synergistic effect of market orientation and learning orientation on organizational performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27(4), 411–427. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070399274002
Bakker, A. B., de Vries, J. D. (2021). Job Demands–Resources theory and self-regulation: new explanations and remedies for job burnout. Anxiety, Stress and Coping, 34(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2020.1797695
Bandura, A. (1978). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Advances in Behavior Research and Therapy, 1(4), 139–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/0146-6402(78)90002-4
Bandura, A. (2006). Guide to the construction of self-efficacy scales. In F. Pajares and T. Urdan (Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents, Vol. 5 (307-337). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
Bandura, A., Cervone, D. (1986). Differential engagement of self-reactive cognitive motivation. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 38, 92–113.
Blackwell, L. S., Trzesniewski, K. H., Dweck, C. S. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study. Child Development, 78(1), 246–263. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4139223
Braun, T. J., Hayes, B. C., DeMuth, R. L. F., Taran, O. A. (2017). The development, validation, and practical application of an employee agility and resilience measure to facilitate organizational change. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 10(4), 703–723. https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2017.79
Chernova, L., Mazurkevych, O., Chernova, L. (2018). The model of assessing the general intensity of resistance to changes in an organization. Innovative Technologies Scientific Solutions for Industries, 4(6), 77–83.
Chonko, L. B., Jones, E. (2005). The need for speed: Agility selling. The Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management , 25(4), 371–382.
Chughtai, M. S., Fauzia Syed, Naseer, S. (2022). Learning organizations and employees’ outcomes: A perspective of psychosocial safety climate. NICE Research Journal, 15(1), 15–46. https://doi.org/10.51239/nrjss.vi.329
Chughtai, M. S., Khalid, Y. (2022). Learning organizations and innovative work behaviors: A moderated mediation model of creative self-efficacy and self-leadership from the perspective of social cognitive theory and social schema theory. Journal of Innovative Research in Management Sciences, 3(1), 22–41. https://doi.org/10.62270/jirms.vi.24
Compeau, D., Higgins, C. A., Huff, S. (1999). Social cognitive theory and individual reactions to computing technology: A longitudinal study. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 23(2), 145–158. https://doi.org/10.2307/249749
Doeze Jager – van Vliet, S. B., Born, M. P., van der Molen, H. T. (2019). Using a portfolio-based process to develop agility among employees. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 30(1), 39–60. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.21337
Dumitriu, F., Mesnita, G., Oprea, D., Radu, L.-D. (2019). Challenges of Scaling Agile At Organization Level. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Informatics in Economy Education, Research and Business Technologies (339–344). https://doi.org/10.12948/ie2019.05.06
Dweck, C. S., Chiu, C., Hong, Y., Inquiry, S. P. (1995). Implicit theories and their role in judgments and reactions: A world from two perspectives stable. Psychological Inquiry, 6(4), 267–285.
Gupta, A. K., Govindarajan, V. (2002). Cultivating of global mindset. Academy of Management Executive, 16(1), 116–126. https://doi.org/10.5465/AME.2002.6640211
Hildenbrand, Y., Bomberg, D. (2013). Affordance perception through a digital mindset: A dual process theory perspective. In International Conference on Information System. Hyderabad.
Huebschmann, N. A., Sheets, E. S. (2020). The right mindset: stress mindset moderates the association between perceived stress and depressive symptoms. Anxiety, Stress and Coping, 33(3), 248–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2020.1736900
Iqbal, A., Latif, K. F., Ahmad, M. S. (2020). Servant leadership and employee innovative Behavior: exploring psychological pathways. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 41(6), 813–827. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-11-2019-0474
Mau, W.-C. J., Perkins, V. J., Mau, Y.-H. (2016). Gender and racial differences in career decision-making dispositions of college students enrolled in STEM majors. Universal Journal of Psychology, 4(6), 254–260. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujp.2016.040602
Ján, D., Veronika, T. (2017). Examination of factors affecting the implementation of organizational changes. Journal of Competitiveness, 9(4), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2017.04.01
Jiang, Y., Zhang, J., Ming, H., Huang, S., Lin, D. (2019). Stressful life events and well-being among rural-to-urban migrant adolescents: The moderating role of the stress mindset and differences between genders. Journal of Adolescence, 74(May), 24–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2019.05.005
Kauppila, O. P., Tempelaar, M. P. (2016). The social-cognitive underpinnings of employees’ ambidextrous behavior and the supportive role of group managers’ leadership. Journal of Management Studies, 53(6), 1019–1044. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12192
Keskin, H. (2006). Market orientation, learning orientation, and innovation capabilities in SMEs: An extended model. European Journal of Innovation Management, 9(4), 396–417. https://doi.org/10.1108/14601060610707849
Komarraju, M., Swanson, J., Nadler, D. (2014). Increased career self-efficacy predicts college students’ motivation, and course and major satisfaction. Journal of Career Assessment, 22(3), 420–432. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072713498484
Lee, W. R., Choi, S. B., Kang, S. W. (2021). How leaders’ positive feedback influences employees’ innovative behavior: The mediating role of voice behavior and job autonomy. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(4), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041901
Limeri, L. B., Carter, N. T., Choe, J., Harper, H. G., Martin, H. R., Benton, A., Dolan, E. L. (2020). Growing a growth mindset: characterizing how and why undergraduate students’ mindsets change. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00227-2
Luthans, F., Stajkovic, A. D. (1998). Going beyond traditional motivational and behavioral approaches. Organizational Dynamics, Spring, 62–74.
Madrid, H. P., Patterson, M. G., Birdi, K. S., Leiva, P. I., Kausel, E. E. (2014). The role of weekly high-activated positive mood, context, and personality in innovative work behavior: A multilevel and interactional model. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(2), 234–256. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1867
McCann, J., Sparks, B. (2019). The effects of leadership styles on innovative work behavior and the role of locus of control in the manufacturing environment. Journal of Organizational Psychology, 19(1). Retrieved from https://articlearchives.co/index.php/JOP/article/view/4256
McCormick, M. J. (2001). self-efficacy and leadership effectiveness: applying social cognitive theory to leadership. Journal of Leadership Studies, 8(1), 22–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/107179190100800102
Paasivaara, M., Lassenius, C. (2016). Challenges and success factors for large-scale agile transformations — A research proposal and a pilot study. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 24-May-201. https://doi.org/10.1145/2962695.2962704
Petermann, M. K. H., Zacher, H. (2020). Agility in the workplace: Conceptual analysis, contributing factors, and practical examples. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 13(4), 599–609. https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2020.106
Petermann, M. K. H., Zacher, H. (2022). Workforce agility: development and validation of a multidimensional measure. Frontiers in Psychology, 13(March). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.841862
Rajabbeigi, M., Moshiri, M., Safarzadeh, H. (2022). Market orientation, learning orientation, and innovation capabilities in SMEs: Case study from Iran’s SMEs. International Journal of Health Sciences, May 2022, 47753–47761. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6ns7.13389
Razmi, B., Mohammad Ghasemi, H. (2015). Designing a model of organizational agility: A case study of Ardabil gas company. International Journal of Organizational Leadership, 4(2), 100–117. https://doi.org/10.33844/ijol.2015.60224
Rhee, J., Seog, S. D., Bozorov, F., Dedahanov, A. T. (2017). Organizational structure and employees’ innovative behavior: The mediating role of empowerment. Social Behavior and Personality, 45(9), 1523–1536. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.6433
Rupčić, N. (2022). Threats and opportunities for learning organizations — Nordic perspective and experience. Learning Organization, 29(3), 275–283. https://doi.org/10.1108/TLO-04-2022-280
Salanova, M., Llorens, S., Schaufeli, W. B. (2011). “Yes, I can, I feel good, and I just do it!” On gain cycles and spirals of efficacy beliefs, affect, and engagement. Applied Psychology, 60(2), 255–285. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2010.00435.x
Shanker, R., Bhanugopan, R., van der Heijden, B. I. J. M., Farrell, M. (2017). Organizational climate for innovation and organizational performance: The mediating effect of innovative work behavior. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 100, 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2017.02.004
Sinkula, J. M., Baker, W. E., Noordewier, T. (1997). A framework for market-based organizational learning: Linking values, knowledge, and behavior. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 25(4), 305–318. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070397254003
Song, H. D., Grabowski, B. L. (2006). Stimulating intrinsic motivation for problem solving using goal-oriented contexts and peer group composition. Educational Technology Research and Development, 54(5), 445–466. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-006-0128-6
Sung, W., Kim, C. (2021). A study on the effect of change management on organizational innovation: Focusing on the mediating effect of members’ innovative behavior. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(4), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042079
Taing, M. U., Smith, T., Singla, N., Johnson, R. E., Chang, C. H. (2013). The relationship between learning goal orientation, goal setting, and performance: A longitudinal study. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43(8), 1668–1675. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12119
Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 920(October), 1–43. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., Shuen, A. (2009). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Knowledge and Strategy, 18(April 1991), 77–116. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198781806.003.0019
Vial, G. (2019). Understanding digital transformation: a review and a research agenda. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst., 28(2), 118–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2019.01.003
Winkler, R. (2015). Conditions for implementing organizational changes. Acta Logistica, 2(4), 21–24. https://doi.org/10.22306/al.v2i4.49
Yeager, D. S., Dweck, C. S. (2012). Mindsets that promote resilience: when students believe that personal characteristics can be developed. Educational Psychologist, 47(4), 302–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2012.722805
.jpg)
