Hide
Раскрыть
Русский

Organizational Psychology


Editorial office

Address: 20, Myasnitskaya, 101000 Moscow, Russia

Email: orgpsyjournal@hse.ru
orgpsy.russia@gmail.com

     
Our Partners
 
 

 

 

 

 

Elena Ovchinnikova1, Emiliya Safiullina2
  • 1 National Research University Higher School of Economics, 20 Myasnitskaya Str., Moscow, 101000, Russian Federation
  • 2 Higher School of Economics, 20 Myasnitskaya str., Moscow, 101000, Russia

The role of person-organization fit in the formation of company’s human capital (In Russian)

2013. Vol. 3. No. 4. P. 2–17 [issue contents]

In this study was analyzed the content of «Person—Organization Fit» definition, and the role of Person—Organization Fit in the formation of Company’s Human Capital was examined. During the investigated we used the method of content-analysis, which included 38 study-papers as a sample. The study-papers were published in last 30 years and were selected according to their citation index. As a result of our study it was revealed the most relevant definition of Person—Organization Fit phenomena for the usage among this science field developing in Russia. We suggest that the POF is one of the key-instruments to formation of Company’s Human Capital. Moreover it was found out that the logic of structure of the POF as phenomena is following: Person—Job Fit → Person—Supervisor Fit → Person—Group Fit → Person—Organization Fit → Person–Environment Fit. This can be explained as a principle of «psychological entering the company by an employee». Significantly the least attention is paid to the Person—Supervisor Fit type, and the complementary fit mentioned by the scientists in this area less, than the supplementary fit. An additional point is that we attempt to offer the model of the functioning of POF, which covers the description of its role in human resource management practices, and in the formation of human capital of the organization in whole.

References

Becker, G.S. (2003). Chelovecheskoe povedenie: ekonomicheskii podkhod. Izbrannye trudy po ekono- micheskoi teorii [The Economic Approach to Human Behavior. Selected papers on economic theory]. Per. s angl. Sost., nauch. red., poslesl. R.I. Kapelyushnikov; predisl. M.I. Levin. Moscow: GU–VShE.

Bretz, R.D., Judge, T.A. (1994). Person—organization fit and the theory of work adjustment: implications for satisfaction, tenure and career success. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 44, 43—54.

Bryukhov, A.M. (2012). Nauchnyi analiz ponyatii «Chelovecheskii kapital» i «Upravlenie chelovecheskim kapitalom» [Scientific analysis of the concepts of "human capital" and "Human Capital Management"]. Chelyabinskii gumanitarii, 1 (18). 23—26.

Cable, D.M. (1996). Person–Organization Fit, Job Choice Decisions, and Organizational Entry. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67 (3), 294—311.

Cable, D.M., Judge, T.A. (1997). Interviewers’ perceptions of person—organization fit and organizational selection decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82 (4), 546—561.

Caldwell, S.D., Herold, D.M., Fedor, D.B. (2004). Toward an Understanding of the Relationships Among Organizational Change, Individual Differences, and Changes in Person–Environment Fit: A CrossLevel Study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89 (5), 868—882.

Chang, H.-T., Chi, N.-W., Chuang, A. (2010). Exploring the Moderating Roles of Perceived Person–Job Fit and Person–Organization Fit on the Relationship between Training Investment and Knowledge Workers’ Turnover Intentions. Applied Psychology, 59 (4), 566—593.

Chatman, J. (1989). Improving Interactional Organizational Research: A Model of Person— Organization Fit. Academy of Management reviews, 14 (3), 333—349.

Chen, C., Lee, H.M., Yeh, Y.J. (2008). The Antecedent and Consequence of Person–Organization Fit: Ingratiation, similarity, hiring recommendations and job offer. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 16 (3), 203—219.

De Cooman, R., De Gieter, S., Pepermans, R., Hermans, S., Du Bois, S., Caers, R., Jegers, M. (2009). Person–organization fit: Testing socialization and attraction–selection–attrition hypotheses. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 74 (1), 102—107.

Holland, J. L. (1959). A theory of vocational choice. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 6, 35—45.

Kapelyushnikov, R.I. (2012). Skol'ko stoit chelovecheskii kapital Rossii? [How much is the human capital of Russia?] Preprint WP3/2012/06, Moscow: Izd. dom Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki.

Kim, T., Cable, D. (2005). Socialization Tactics, Employee Proactivity, and Person–Organization Fit. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 232—241.

Kristof, A.L. (1996). Person—organization fit: an integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurements, and implications. Personnel psychology, 49 (1), 1—49.

Kristof-Brown, A.E., Zimmerman, R.D., Johnson, E.C. (2005). Consequences of individuals› fit at work: a meta-analysis of person–job, person–organization, person–group, and person–supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology, 58, 281—342.

Lauver, K.J., Kristof-Brown, A. (2001). Distinguishing between Employees’ Perceptions of Person–Job and Person–Organization Fit. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 59 (3), 454—470.

Lievens F., Decaesteker C., Coetsier P., Geirnaert J. (2001). Organizational Attractiveness for Prospective Applicants: A Person—Organization Perspective. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 50, 30—51.

Meglino, B.M., Ravlin, E. (1998). Individual Values in Organizations: Concepts, Controversies, and Research. Journal of Management, 24(3), 351—389.

O’Reilly, C.A., Chatman, J., Caldwell, D.F. (1991). People and Organizational Culture: A Profile Comparison Approach to Assessing Person—Organization Fit. Academy of Management Journal, 34 (3), 387—516.

Piasentin, K.A., Chapman, D.S. (2007). Perceived similarity and complementarity as predictors of subjective person–organization fit. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology , 80 (2), 34—354.

Posner, B.Z. (2010) Another Look at the Impact of Personal and Organizational Values Congruency. Journal of Business Ethics, 97, 535—541.

Saks, A.M., Ashforth, B. (2002). Is Job Search Related to Employment Quality? It All Depends on the Fit. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87 (4), 646—654.

Schneider, B. (2001). Fits About Fit. Applied Psychology, 50 (1), 141—152.

Schneider, B., Smith, D.B., Taylor, S., Fleenor, J. (1998). Personality and Organizations: A Test of the Homogeneity of Personality Hypothesis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 462—470.

Van Vianen, A.E.M. (2000). Person—organization fit: the match between newcomers’ and recruiters’ preferences for organizational cultures. Personnel psychology, 53, 113—122.

Van Vianen, A.E.M. (2001). Person—organization fit: the match between theory and methodology: Introduction to the special issues. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 50, 1—4.

Verquer, M.L., Beehr, T.A., Wagner, S.H. (2003). A meta-analysis of relations between person– organization fit and work attitudes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63 (3), 473—489.

Westerman, J.W., Cyr, L.A. (2004). An Integrative Analysis of Person–Organization Fit Theories. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 12 (3), 252—261.

Yaniv, E., Farkas, F. (2005). The Impact of Person—Organization Fit on the Corporate Brand Perception of Employees and of Customers. Journal of Change Management, 5 (4), 447—461.

 
Citation: Mandrikova, E., Safiullina, E. (2013). Rol' sootvetstviya lichnosti organizatsii (person—organization fit) v formirovanii chelovecheskogo kapitala organizatsii [The Role of Person-Organization Fit in the formation of Company’s Human Capital]. Organizational Psychology, 4, 2-17. (in Russian)
Keywords: Person—Organization Fit (POF); value congruence; practice of human resource management; company’s human capital
BiBTeX
RIS
 
Rambler's Top100 rss